MissingPackageRevision: version 1: "<=" operator used without package revision: RDEPEND="!<=net-misc/asterisk-16.30.0:0/16"; did you mean either of: ('!<=net-misc/asterisk-16.30.0-r0', '!<=net-misc/asterisk-16.30.0-r9999')?
  MissingPackageRevision: version 1: "<=" operator used without package revision: RDEPEND="!<=net-misc/asterisk-18.18.0:0/18"; did you mean either of: ('!<=net-misc/asterisk-18.18.0-r0', '!<=net-misc/asterisk-18.18.0-r9999')?
  MissingPackageRevision: version 1: "<=" operator used without package revision: RDEPEND="!<=net-misc/asterisk-20.3.0:0/20"; did you mean either of: ('!<=net-misc/asterisk-20.3.0-r0', '!<=net-misc/asterisk-20.3.0-r9999')?
  MissingPackageRevision: version 2: "<=" operator used without package revision: RDEPEND="!<=net-misc/asterisk-16.30.0:0/16"; did you mean either of: ('!<=net-misc/asterisk-16.30.0-r0', '!<=net-misc/asterisk-16.30.0-r9999')?
  MissingPackageRevision: version 2: "<=" operator used without package revision: RDEPEND="!<=net-misc/asterisk-18.18.0:0/18"; did you mean either of: ('!<=net-misc/asterisk-18.18.0-r0', '!<=net-misc/asterisk-18.18.0-r9999')?
  MissingPackageRevision: version 2: "<=" operator used without package revision: RDEPEND="!<=net-misc/asterisk-20.3.0:0/20"; did you mean either of: ('!<=net-misc/asterisk-20.3.0-r0', '!<=net-misc/asterisk-20.3.0-r9999')?
  MissingPackageRevision: version 3: "<=" operator used without package revision: RDEPEND="!<=net-misc/asterisk-16.30.0:0/16"; did you mean either of: ('!<=net-misc/asterisk-16.30.0-r0', '!<=net-misc/asterisk-16.30.0-r9999')?
  MissingPackageRevision: version 3: "<=" operator used without package revision: RDEPEND="!<=net-misc/asterisk-18.18.0:0/18"; did you mean either of: ('!<=net-misc/asterisk-18.18.0-r0', '!<=net-misc/asterisk-18.18.0-r9999')?
  MissingPackageRevision: version 3: "<=" operator used without package revision: RDEPEND="!<=net-misc/asterisk-20.3.0:0/20"; did you mean either of: ('!<=net-misc/asterisk-20.3.0-r0', '!<=net-misc/asterisk-20.3.0-r9999')?